Bug 207625
Summary: | alternatives doesn't have jdb | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan Glaschke <bugzilla> |
Component: | java-1.4.2-gcj-compat | Assignee: | Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | keiths |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-04-02 14:42:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jonathan Glaschke
2006-09-21 23:32:19 UTC
Yes, we should have a readline-based jdb replacement that uses JVMTI to interface to libgcj's bytecode interpreter. The first step though, is implementing JVMTI, which is in active development in the gcc repository. I'll leave this open until we have a jdb replacement, likely for FC-7. Keith, any chance of a jdb-like command in Fedora 7? There are no plans to write a jdb replacement. |