Bug 207625

Summary: alternatives doesn't have jdb
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jonathan Glaschke <bugzilla>
Component: java-1.4.2-gcj-compatAssignee: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6CC: keiths
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-02 14:42:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jonathan Glaschke 2006-09-21 23:32:19 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060918 Fedora/1.5.0.7-3.fc6 Firefox/1.5.0.7 pango-text

Description of problem:
I'm not sure i this is a bug or a feature, but i recently noticed that alternatives --display java does not include jdb.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. /usr/sbin/alternatives --display java
2.
3.

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2006-10-03 14:34:52 UTC
Yes, we should have a readline-based jdb replacement that uses JVMTI to
interface to libgcj's bytecode interpreter.  The first step though, is
implementing JVMTI, which is in active development in the gcc repository.

I'll leave this open until we have a jdb replacement, likely for FC-7.


Comment 2 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-01-11 20:45:56 UTC
Keith, any chance of a jdb-like command in Fedora 7?


Comment 3 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-04-02 14:42:48 UTC
There are no plans to write a jdb replacement.