Bug 2077914

Summary:	separate licenses from rpminspect-data-fedora
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component:	rpminspect-data-fedora	Assignee:	David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	code, dcantrell, msuchy, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rpminspect-data-fedora-1.9-1.fc37	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	2077908	Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-07-14 18:11:15 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2077908
Bug Blocks:

Description Miroslav Suchý 2022-04-22 15:03:47 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2077908 +++

Unfortunately, rpminspect-data-fedora brings in a lot of heavy-weight transitive dependencies, including clamav-data at over 200 MB. Maybe there is something that can be done in rpminspect-data-fedora to make it easier to depend on just the license data without bringing in everything needed to use the rpminspect config.

It would be awesome if the license/fedora.json can be put into separate subpackage. As it should not require anything else.

Comment 1 David Cantrell 2022-04-22 16:24:12 UTC

Working on that at the moment.  The license data is actually moving to a separate project entirely and then the file will go away in rpminspect-data-fedora (and the others) and the data package will just start depending on the new license-data package that delivers that file.

Comment 2 David Cantrell 2022-07-14 18:11:15 UTC

This is done with rpminspect-data-fedora-1.9.  That release is now built across epel7, epel8, epel9, and the currently supported Fedora releases.