Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2078028

Summary: Rebase to upstream release 1.1.3
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Pavel Reichl <preichl>
Component: exfatprogsAssignee: Pavel Reichl <preichl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Kun Wang <kunwan>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0CC: kunwan, swhiteho, xzhou
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: 9.1Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: exfatprogs-1.1.3-1.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-15 11:16:08 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version: 1.1.3
Embargoed:

Description Pavel Reichl 2022-04-22 21:59:59 UTC 
Rebase to newer upstream version which contains fixes for some issues found by covscan.
Comment 3 Steve Whitehouse 2022-04-23 07:31:37 UTC 
Yes, definitely. That said the support is similar to vfat, msdos, etc., and not the level that we'd normally give for XFS, ext4. The feature is provided as a convenience rather than as a fully supported filesystem. Has it been missed from the test plan somehow?
Comment 5 Murphy Zhou 2022-04-23 23:27:48 UTC 
Thanks all for the clarification. It's very useful for our workload/capacity planning. It's on our plan.
Comment 6 Pavel Reichl 2022-05-09 13:25:55 UTC 
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/exfatprogs/-/merge_requests/3
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-15 11:16:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (exfatprogs bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8306