Bug 2078028
| Summary: | Rebase to upstream release 1.1.3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Pavel Reichl <preichl> |
| Component: | exfatprogs | Assignee: | Pavel Reichl <preichl> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Kun Wang <kunwan> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 9.0 | CC: | kunwan, swhiteho, xzhou |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | 9.1 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | exfatprogs-1.1.3-1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-11-15 11:16:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | 1.1.3 |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Pavel Reichl
2022-04-22 21:59:59 UTC
Yes, definitely. That said the support is similar to vfat, msdos, etc., and not the level that we'd normally give for XFS, ext4. The feature is provided as a convenience rather than as a fully supported filesystem. Has it been missed from the test plan somehow? Thanks all for the clarification. It's very useful for our workload/capacity planning. It's on our plan. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (exfatprogs bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8306 |