Bug 207823

Summary: "Message -> Apply Filters" produces error
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ben Konrath <ben>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-25 16:16:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
error dialog none

Description Ben Konrath 2006-09-24 00:00:51 UTC 
Description of problem:

My Filters are currently not working automatically. When I do "Message -> Apply
Filters", I get the attached error message.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

% rpm -qa | grep evolution
evolution-sharp-0.11.1-10.fc6
evolution-data-server-devel-1.8.0-9.fc6
evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6
evolution-2.8.0-5.fc6
evolution-webcal-2.7.1-6

How reproducible:

Always
Comment 1 Ben Konrath 2006-09-24 00:00:51 UTC 
Created attachment 137008 [details]
error dialog
Comment 2 Matthew Barnes 2006-09-24 01:00:49 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report.

What kind of mail account are you using?  Also, if you run Evolution from a
terminal window do you see any strange warnings or messages?
Comment 3 Ben Konrath 2006-09-24 17:37:34 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> What kind of mail account are you using?  Also, if you run Evolution from a
> terminal window do you see any strange warnings or messages?

I'm using an IMAP account but I played around little more and I think I solved
the problem. The filter was set with evolution from FC5 (I think it was 2.6).
When I set the destination folder again, the filter started working. Are the
conf files from different versions of evolution supposed to be compatible? Thanks.
Comment 4 Matthew Barnes 2006-09-25 15:56:26 UTC 
I thought so but I can't say for certain.

May I close this bug or is there an outstanding issue that you think should be
addressed?
Comment 5 Ben Konrath 2006-09-25 16:00:38 UTC 
I think it should be closed. Thanks.
Comment 6 Matthew Barnes 2006-09-25 16:16:55 UTC 
Closing as WORKSFORME.

Although this *may* be a symptom of a bug somewhere, there's not enough
information here to investigate further.