Bug 2079232

Summary:	ramen-hub-operator pod is getting into CLBO with the fresh install of Openshift DR Hub Operator
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation	Reporter:	Bipin Kunal <bkunal>
Component:	odf-dr	Assignee:	Shyamsundar <srangana>
odf-dr sub component:	ramen	QA Contact:	kmanohar
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	high
Priority:	low	CC:	kramdoss, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, rtalur, srangana
Version:	4.10	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	kramdoss: needinfo+
Target Release:	ODF 4.14.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-08 18:49:50 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 14 Shyamsundar 2023-03-08 14:11:30 UTC

Added upstream tracker: https://github.com/RamenDR/ramen/issues/271

If we can add nativeAPIs to the CSV this may get handled at install time and not error out during runtime due to missing dependencies.

Comment 25 kmanohar 2023-10-13 19:53:08 UTC

@rtalur @bkunal 

Observered following behaviour :-

Steps performed :-
-> Create catsrc of 4.14.0-146
-> Install DR hub operator on a fresh setup, ramen pod will be in running state
-> Install ACM downstream, installation fails and the ramen pod flips between Running and CLBO state

Additional:
Tried to install ACM multiple time.

Setup is in repro state - https://ocs4-jenkins-csb-odf-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/qe-deploy-ocs-cluster/29766/

Comment 26 kmanohar 2023-10-20 15:37:48 UTC

@rtalur 

Were you able to check the logs that I shared with you?

Comment 28 kmanohar 2023-10-25 11:10:04 UTC

@rtalur 
Installed the hub operator on openshift-operators namespace, in that way, didn't observe any issues.

Comment 29 kmanohar 2023-10-26 15:01:53 UTC

@rtalur is there any other test needed before we mark this bug as verified?

Comment 30 Raghavendra Talur 2023-11-02 13:24:33 UTC

(In reply to kmanohar from comment #29)
> @rtalur is there any other test needed before we mark this bug as
> verified?

Looks good to me. You can mark it as verified.

Comment 31 kmanohar 2023-11-03 04:37:08 UTC

Marking it verified based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079232#c30

Comment 33 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-08 18:49:50 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.14.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:6832