Bug 2079295
| Summary: | Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Anton Guda <atu> |
| Component: | busybox | Assignee: | Tom "spot" Callaway <spotrh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 37 | CC: | admiller, davide, dvlasenk, epel-packagers-sig, fsumsal, gasinvein, jadahl, jbash, marcosfrm, mhofmann, redhat, robinlee.sysu, spotrh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | busybox-1.36.0-1.fc37 busybox-1.36.0-1.fc36 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-01-19 06:10:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Anton Guda
2022-04-27 10:48:59 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle. Changing version to 37. This issue breaks using `virtme-run` with -script-sh or -script-exec, as that works by copying the assumingly static /usr/sbin/busybox into a initramfs where it will assume it'll work without external shared objects. It doesn't, however, unless one *also* copies /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 into /lib in the initramfs. Doing that, I'd say is a work around, one should be able to assume /usr/sbin/busybox is a static executable, can one not, assuming no busybox-shared etc is installed. This applies to F36 too. Should I clone this bug for F36? Some other observations: In F35, `ldd /usr/sbin/busybox` gives me "not a dynamic executable" while on F36 I get linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc89161000) ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 => /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x00007fa94925e000) From busybox-1.35.0-4.fc36.x86_64:
$ rpm -qi busybox | grep Summary
Summary : Statically linked binary providing simplified versions of system commands
$ rpm -qlv busybox | grep /usr/sbin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 abr 8 2022 /usr/lib/.build-id/31/dce81049eeba32603072cedae67e731390c0e3 -> ../../../../usr/sbin/busybox
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1245312 abr 8 2022 /usr/sbin/busybox
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 abr 8 2022 /usr/sbin/busybox.musl.static -> ./busybox
$ ldd /usr/sbin/busybox
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe90ee9000)
ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 => /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x00007f4f4f6aa000)
Not static at all. :(
As another data point, this broke the upgrade of the RH kernel CI infrastructure from FC35 -> FC37 as the busybox executable was used standalone 😂. FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-9483e38187` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. *** Bug 2160300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seems all Ok. Propose to close this bug. FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |