Bug 2079484

Summary:	sos report --list-plugins ignores -k and -a options
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Component:	sos	Assignee:	Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Miroslav Hradílek <mhradile>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	8.7	CC:	agk, bmr, mhradile, plambri, pmoravec, sbradley, theute
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression, Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sos-4.3-2.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2079490 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-11-08 10:50:39 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2079490

Description Pavel Moravec 2022-04-27 15:33:15 UTC

Description of problem:
sos report --list-plugins does not honour -k or -a options and always prints bare defaults. This is a regression from 4.2 when user can see what it has configured (via a preset, config file or cmdline option).

The issue is just with -l option, the -k -a options do set the options properly, otherwise.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sos-4.3-1


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. sos report -l -k dnf.history-info=on
2. sos report -l -a


Actual results:
1. shows:
..
The following plugin options are available:
 dnf.history-info          off             collect detailed transaction history
..

2. shows:
..
The following plugin options are available:
(list of "off" options despite -a enabled them)



Expected results:
1. to show
..
The following plugin options are available:
 dnf.history-info          on             collect detailed transaction history
..

2. to show just "on" plugin options


Additional info:

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-08 10:50:39 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (sos bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:7732