Bug 2080235
Summary: | Misleading errors about missing shared libraries when scanning | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> |
Component: | hplip | Assignee: | Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 35 | CC: | jridky, tkorbar, twaugh, zdohnal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | hplip-3.22.4-1.fc36 hplip-3.22.4-1.fc35 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-06-03 03:07:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2022-04-29 10:08:07 UTC
Hi Dominik, I'm sorry for the late response and thank you for filing the bug! The issue was a little tricky - we shipped libhpmud.so in hplip-libs in the past, but rpmlint was complaining about it so it was removed. The proper solution would be to have the file in -devel package, but then we would need to require -devel package during runtime, which is not ideal as well. So in the end I've removed loading of unversioned .so files. The commit is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hplip/c/297f625d957216cbfffbab984afbc76424f5e30f?branch=rawhide . FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8 FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78 FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Confirmed fixed on F36, thanks! FEDORA-2022-83d0e628a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #6) > Confirmed fixed on F36, thanks! Thank you for checking this, Dominik! FEDORA-2022-0ec7dd5c78 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |