Bug 2081133
Summary: | Kubevirt labels are applied to worker nodes having no support for virtualization | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Container Native Virtualization (CNV) | Reporter: | Dale Bewley <dbewley> |
Component: | Virtualization | Assignee: | Itamar Holder <iholder> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Kedar Bidarkar <kbidarka> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.10.0 | CC: | acardace, cnv-qe-bugs, fdeutsch |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.12.0 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-10-11 07:32:50 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dale Bewley
2022-05-02 20:17:53 UTC
If i understood the problem correctly it's about marking the node unschedulable when virtualization is not supported. One way to verify if virtualization is supported is to verify that `svm` or `vmx` are supported or in other words check that the output of : `egrep -o '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo | sort | uniq` isn't empty. More than marking the virt-incompatible nodes kubevirt unschedulable, I believe the problem is there should be no kubevirt labels applied to such nodes. I'll have to repro my past observations in a nested virt vSphere lab, but I just checked a 4.11.5 cluster on AWS with a pair of baremetal workers along side ec2 workers. I do not see this problem there. Only the metal instances have kubevirt labels. Closing it as not a bug since this field is internal and shouldn't be used by users. Although, since it's truly confusing, I've opened this issue for changing the label's name: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/8583 For more info: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/8554#issuecomment-1272909490 |