Bug 2082607

Summary: virtio-win RPM for rhel-9.0.z [rhel-9.0.0.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: RHEL Program Management Team <pgm-rhel-tools>
Component: virtio-winAssignee: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe>
virtio-win sub component: distribution QA Contact: Qianqian Zhu <qizhu>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: unspecified    
Priority: unspecified CC: coli, ddepaula, ehadley, jferlan, jinzhao, juzhang, phou, vrozenfe, xiagao, ymankad
Version: 9.0Keywords: Triaged, ZStream
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2076535 Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-09 12:22:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2076535    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 7 xiagao 2022-06-14 03:06:39 UTC
Vadim, hi
I have two questions to ask about virtio-win-1.9.26-1.el9_0
- The installer didn't have Winfsp msi installation during creating a virtiofs service, is it expected?
- The virtiofs service start type is Manual,but not Automated, is it expected?

Thank you in advance.
Xiaoling

Comment 8 Vadim Rozenfeld 2022-06-14 03:27:44 UTC
(In reply to xiagao from comment #7)
> Vadim, hi
> I have two questions to ask about virtio-win-1.9.26-1.el9_0
> - The installer didn't have Winfsp msi installation during creating a
> virtiofs service, is it expected?
> - The virtiofs service start type is Manual,but not Automated, is it
> expected?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> Xiaoling

Hi Xiaoling,

For the current installer the answer is "yes" for both your questions.
Winfsp installation is not included in the bundle. virtiofs has a Manual 
start type mostly because it used to be a problem with Automated start in 
case if Winfsp was not installed or corrupted.

Best regards,
Vadim.

Comment 9 xiagao 2022-06-14 03:51:26 UTC
Thank Vadim for your quick reply.
Another tiny issue is all drivers copyright is 2012-2021, could you help to extend the year? Thanks again.

Comment 10 Vadim Rozenfeld 2022-06-14 06:02:37 UTC
(In reply to xiagao from comment #9)
> Thank Vadim for your quick reply.
> Another tiny issue is all drivers copyright is 2012-2021, could you help to
> extend the year? Thanks again.

Sure. 
It will not be a problem to update the license file but updating *.inf files will 
require rebuilding and re-WHQL'ing the driver. Can we postpone this work to 9.1 ? In any
case, please open a new bug and assigned to me.

All the best,
Vadim.

Comment 11 xiagao 2022-06-14 06:10:44 UTC
(In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #10)
> (In reply to xiagao from comment #9)
> > Thank Vadim for your quick reply.
> > Another tiny issue is all drivers copyright is 2012-2021, could you help to
> > extend the year? Thanks again.
> 
> Sure. 
> It will not be a problem to update the license file but updating *.inf files
> will 
> require rebuilding and re-WHQL'ing the driver. Can we postpone this work to
> 9.1 ? In any
> case, please open a new bug and assigned to me.

I agree with you because this issue is tiny and won't affect the usage of users.

> 
> All the best,
> Vadim.

Comment 12 Qianqian Zhu 2022-06-20 02:04:16 UTC
Hi Xiaoling,
Please help to open a new bz for the copyright issue as Vadim suggested, thanks.

Comment 15 xiagao 2022-06-23 03:13:01 UTC
(In reply to Qianqian Zhu from comment #12)
> Hi Xiaoling,
> Please help to open a new bz for the copyright issue as Vadim suggested,
> thanks.

OK,the bug was opened, bug 2096520.

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2022-08-09 12:22:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (virtio-win bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:5947