Bug 2082857
Summary: | "Warning! Unable to generate a proper UUID!" when built against libuuid 2.38 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> |
Component: | gdisk | Assignee: | Terje Røsten <terje.rosten> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 36 | CC: | terje.rosten |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gdisk-1.0.9-2.fc36 gdisk-1.0.9-2.fc35 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-05-11 01:19:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2022-05-07 23:34:34 UTC
Oddly enough, applying the above upstream patch doesn't fix the warning for sgdisk in the testsuite, and Fedora popt doesn't contain the change mentioned in the bug report above, so I don't fully understand what's going on here. Sorry, I confused two issues. We're not affected by the popt issue yet (but will be once a release with the change mentioned above makes it into a popt release in Fedora, so it's a good idea to run the testsuite in %check to catch it). This one is related to libuuid and the fix for it is actually here: https://sourceforge.net/p/gptfdisk/code/ci/6a8416cbd12d55f882bb751993b94f72d338d96f/ I can confirm that building gdisk with this patch applied fixes the warnings in both the testsuite and in my test case. Downgrading to 1.0.8-3.fc36 helps, because it was built against libuuid-2.37.2-1.fc36. 1.0.9-1.fc36 was built against libuuid-2.38-0.2.fc36, for which gdisk needs the upstream patch from comment #2. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdisk/pull-request/1 opened to fix this. FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-c086fb92ed has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2022-79bdaa4fbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |