Bug 2083155
| Summary: | After Fedora 36 upgrade: Error starting domain: operation failed: Unable to find a satisfying virtiofsd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan Watt <jwatt> |
| Component: | qemu | Assignee: | Fedora Virtualization Maintainers <virt-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 36 | CC: | agedosier, berrange, cfergeau, clalancette, crobinso, jforbes, laine, libvirt-maint, ondrejj, pbonzini, philmd, rjones, tim, veillard, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | qemu-6.2.0-10.fc36 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-05-23 01:14:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
The virtiofsd binary was previously (mistakenly) included in the qemu-common package which meant it was installed everywhere. It has now been split out into a separate package 'qemu-virtiofsd'. The QEMU C based virtiofsd impl is deprecated by upstream, having been replaced by a Rust based impl. So actually we'd recommend installing the 'virtiofsd' RPM, rather than 'qemu-virtiofsd', to get the Rust impl. Thanks, Daniel. Will the Rust based virtiofsd be available as/in a dnf managed package any time soon? And is there an issue/bug somewhere for that work so I can be notified when I should switch to that (rather than manually having to update the RPM periodically)? Oh, I thought we had it in Fedora already, but I'm mistaken. The work is in progress at least, so hopefully a package review bug will get opened soon. Ah, thanks. I guess Fedora 36 won't get that, so the thing to do is maybe to check `dnf provides /usr/libexec/virtiofsd` once 37 is released? There is a virtual Provides: vhostuser-backend(fs), which the new virtiofsd rust package will also end up providing - better to use that than rely on specific binary paths, if you just want "any" virtiofsd impl and don't care for a specific one. *** Bug 2084421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 2084446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The qemu package is buggy here, the vhostuser-backend(fs) dep is on the `qemu` metapackage, but it should be on the qemu-system-XXX metapackages instead. I'll fix this shortly. It means most existing dependency chains will pull in a virtiofsd, which was the intended behavior when I split this out originally. FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991 FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2022-6ae3d4f991 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Description of problem: After upgrading from Fedora 35 to 36 I can no longer start virtual machines that make a virtio-fs filesystem available to the guest OS: ``` Error starting domain: operation failed: Unable to find a satisfying virtiofsd Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 72, in cb_wrapper callback(asyncjob, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 108, in tmpcb callback(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/object/libvirtobject.py", line 57, in newfn ret = fn(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/object/domain.py", line 1384, in startup self._backend.create() File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1353, in create raise libvirtError('virDomainCreate() failed') libvirt.libvirtError: operation failed: Unable to find a satisfying virtiofsd ``` Removing the virtio-fs filesystems from the virtual machines allows the machines to start the boot process and they boot successfully. How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: The virtual machines were created using a script that invokes virt-install: https://gitlab.com/jwattt/cross-compile-ff-and-libvirt/-/blob/2a806a1025f66561fe11021ca9c09be403bc1c8a/setup-vm.bash#L230