Bug 208337

Summary: [RHEL5 Beta1] anaconda: multipath device name is reverse order of LUN number.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Kiyoshi Ueda <kueda>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Peter Jones <pjones>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: jlaska, jnomura, junichi.nomura, kueda, kueda, tao
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: OtherQA
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0644 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 17:18:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 227613, 228988    

Description Kiyoshi Ueda 2006-09-27 21:53:11 UTC
Description of problem:
Installer names misleading device name for multipath devices.
It seems to be reverse order of LUN number.
(e.g. In 4 LUN environment, LUN#0 is named as "mpath3",
 LUN#1 is named as "mpath2", ..., LUN#3 is name as "mpath0".)


Version-Release number of selected component:
anaconda-11.1.0.99-1


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2006-10-26 19:45:23 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.

Comment 4 Peter Jones 2007-06-27 14:15:51 UTC
Is this still a problem?  As far as I know this was fixed long, long ago. 
Please retest.

Comment 5 David Cantrell 2007-06-27 15:20:37 UTC
Bryn Reeves says this is fixed in the 5.1 nightly trees, but is still dependent
on hardware.  Certain systems are forced to initialize devices in a specific
order and that may not coincide with the LUN order.

However, all hardware aside, the software does init devices in LUN order.  As
soon as hardware comes in, that order is changed up.  Not much we can do about that.

Comment 6 Kiyoshi Ueda 2007-06-27 15:52:17 UTC
Yes, I confirmed this is fixed on our storages.


Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 17:18:07 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0644.html