Bug 2084564

Summary: glibc: iconv: missing macron (unicode 0xAF) in EBCDIC-CP-ES (IBM284) [rhel-8.6.0.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: RHEL Program Management Team <pgm-rhel-tools>
Component: glibcAssignee: Arjun Shankar <ashankar>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Coufal <mcoufal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 8.4CC: alanm, ashankar, codonell, dbodnarc, dj, fweimer, mcoufal, mnewsome, pfrankli, sipoyare, skolosov, tulioqm
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Bugfix, Patch, Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glibc-2.28-189.3.el8_6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: The IBM256, IBM277, IBM278, IBM280, IBM284, IBM297, IBM424 character sets encoded the EBCDIC codepoint 0xBC as the Unicode character U+203E OVERLINE. Consequence: When using the `iconv' program provided by glibc, converting text in those cahracter sets which contain the 0xBC codepoint fails for non-Unicode character sets such as ISO-8859-1 because they cannot encode the U+203E OVERLINE character. Fix: The mapping for the 0xBC codepoint for those IBM character sets is changed to U+00AF MACRON. Result: Input in the IBM277, IBM278, IBM280, IBM284, IBM297 character sets can now be converted to ISO-8859-1 in all cases. For the IBM256 and IBM424 character sets, conversion no longer fails if the input text contains the 0xBC codepoint, and U+00AF MACRON is used in the output.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1961109 Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-16 11:10:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1961109    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-16 11:10:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (glibc bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:5081