Bug 2086176

Summary: [glog][epel]: please build glog in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Component: glogAssignee: John Khvatov <ivaxer>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: dherrera, ivaxer, rosset.filipe, steve.traylen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glog-0.3.5-15.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-17 00:33:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2035373    

Description Kaleb KEITHLEY 2022-05-14 12:24:42 UTC 
Description of problem:

glog(-devel) is a BR for libarrow, which in term is a BR ceph quincy (17.2.x). While ceph itself will not (ever) be built in EPEL, there are Ceph developers who want to use CentOS Stream or RHEL with EPEL.

Note: libarrow and all its dependencies, including glog-devel, are already available from the CentOS Storage SIG. I'm told though that many Ceph devs prefer to use EPEL over the CentOS Storage SIG.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

glog-0.3.5

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

It builds without any changes necessary from rawhide source.  See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87038113

If you don't wish to build glog in EPEL yourself, please add the epel-packagers-sig group as co-maintainer, or (less preferable) add me as a co-maintainer, just for EPEL9 builds.

Thanks
Comment 1 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2022-05-23 16:22:27 UTC 
If you don't wish to build glog in EPEL yourself, please add the epel-packagers-sig group as collaborator, or (less preferable) add me (FAS: kkeithle) as a collaborator, just for EPEL9 builds.

Thanks
Comment 2 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2022-06-06 11:36:57 UTC 
epel-packagers-sig collaborator requested, see https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10824
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2022-06-08 14:18:22 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f8de818769 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f8de818769
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-06-09 00:23:19 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f8de818769 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f8de818769

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-06-17 00:33:21 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f8de818769 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:54:49 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days