Bug 2086449

Summary: [DDF] How about .rgw.buckets.index and .rgw.buckets.non-ec? Can I configure they are erasure-coded pool?
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Documentation sub component: DDF QA Contact: Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi>
Status: NEW --- Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: unspecified CC: akraj, pdhiran
Version: 4.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.3z2   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-05-16 07:35:34 UTC 
How about .rgw.buckets.index and .rgw.buckets.non-ec? Can I configure they are erasure-coded pool?

Reported by: moly7x

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/4/html/storage_strategies_guide/erasure_code_pools#annotations:b3cc988f-5a80-422b-864e-2689704b1310
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2022-05-16 07:35:40 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.