Bug 2087439
| Summary: | update spec file/man page to indicate afterburn is currently only supported on RHCOS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Micah Abbott <miabbott> |
| Component: | rust-afterburn | Assignee: | Steven Presti <spresti> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RHCOS SST QE <rhcos-sst-qe> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 9.0 | CC: | bgilbert, miabbott, mnguyen, travier |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rust-afterburn-5.4.1-1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-05-09 07:53:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Micah Abbott
2022-05-17 20:07:22 UTC
@miabbott I just got around to looking at this, and did notice the RPM description is not explicit enough; however, I seem to not be able to find a man page for afterburn? I don't think there is one at this moment. If I am right about that, is it safe to assume a change to the rpm's description is sufficient? (In reply to Steven Presti from comment #1) > @miabbott I just got around to looking at this, and did notice > the RPM description is not explicit enough; however, I seem to not be able > to find a man page for afterburn? I don't think there is one at this moment. > If I am right about that, is it safe to assume a change to the rpm's > description is sufficient? TBH, I did not check to see if there was any man page packaged with `afterburn`, so I was in error asking for an update there. An update to the description should be sufficient; thanks for asking! This was resolved in this pr into c9s https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/rust-afterburn/-/merge_requests/5. Setting status to ON_QA. Scratch last statement, changing it to MODIFIED. [root@kvm-02-guest30 ~]# rpm -qi afterburn Name : afterburn Version : 5.4.1 Release : 1.el9 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Thu 09 Feb 2023 12:07:04 PM EST Group : Unspecified Size : 8559111 License : ASL 2.0 and MIT and BSD and zlib Signature : (none) Source RPM : rust-afterburn-5.4.1-1.el9.src.rpm Build Date : Tue 07 Feb 2023 12:19:47 AM EST Build Host : x86-64-01.build.eng.rdu2.redhat.com Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> Vendor : Red Hat, Inc. URL : https://crates.io/crates/afterburn Summary : Simple cloud provider agent (RHEL CoreOS only) Description : This software is currently only supported on RHEL CoreOS. Afterburn is a one-shot agent for cloud-like platforms which interacts with provider-specific metadata endpoints. It is typically used in conjunction with Ignition. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (rust-afterburn bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2023:2418 |