Bug 2088131

Summary:	remove etcd_perf before restore
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	OpenShift BugZilla Robot <openshift-bugzilla-robot>
Component:	Etcd	Assignee:	Thomas Jungblut <tjungblu>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	ge liu <geliu>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.10	CC:	tjungblu
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.10.z
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-06-07 13:24:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2087983
Bug Blocks:	2087985

Description OpenShift BugZilla Robot 2022-05-18 19:00:37 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2087983 +++

external contribution by Forlot Romain (claneys)

This commit deletes "etcd_perf" files that could present if someone has ran a fio test under /var/lib/etcd
like specified in the OpenShift docs about the recommended host practices.

As this file is known as non essential, it could be freely deleted by anticipation by the restore pod when
restoring a cluster to a previous state.

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/823

Comment 1 Thomas Jungblut 2022-05-19 06:44:49 UTC

*** Bug 2087985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Thomas Jungblut 2022-05-19 13:49:22 UTC

*** Bug 2087982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-07 13:24:31 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.17 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4882