Bug 2088781
| Summary: | Please branch and build TexMaker for Epel8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | joerg.preiss |
| Component: | texmaker | Assignee: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel8 | CC: | dakingun, nonamedotc, orion |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | texmaker-5.1.3-1.el9 texmaker-5.1.3-1.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-01-22 02:25:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
joerg.preiss
2022-05-20 16:29:32 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. Please branch and build TexMaker in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain TexMaker in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/TexMaker/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion). (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #2) > Please branch and build TexMaker in epel9. > I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion). Thank you! I have added you as a co-maintainer. Would you be able to be the primary point of contact for EPEL? (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) > Would you be able to be the primary point of contact for EPEL? Yes. Thanks. Done. Thank you. Take it away. :) This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-efed14cd82 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-efed14cd82 FEDORA-EPEL-2023-742d7111f6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-742d7111f6 FEDORA-EPEL-2023-efed14cd82 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-efed14cd82 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-742d7111f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-742d7111f6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-efed14cd82 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-742d7111f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |