Bug 2091154
Summary: | RFE: change Ceph quota sizes from bytes to G or M or T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Tupper Cole <tcole> | |
Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Dhairya Parmar <dparmar> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | ngangadh | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Rivka Pollack <rpollack> | |
Priority: | medium | |||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, dparmar, gfarnum, hyelloji, ngangadh, rpollack, tserlin, vshankar | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | |
Target Release: | 7.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-18.2.0-36.el9cp | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
.`quota.max_bytes` is now set in more understandable size values
Previously, the `quota.max_bytes` value was set in bytes, resulting in often very large size values, which was hard to set or changed.
With this enhancement, the `quota.max_bytes` values can now be set with human-friendly values, such as M/Mi, G/Gi, or T/Ti. For example, 10GiB or 100K.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 2294244 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-12-13 15:18:51 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 2237662, 2294244 |
Description
Tupper Cole
2022-05-27 17:02:10 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:7780 |