Bug 2091172
Summary: | Request EPEL9 package - gmsh | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Panos Asproulis <panos.asproulis> |
Component: | gmsh | Assignee: | Sandro Mani <manisandro> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel9 | CC: | cz172638, hobbes1069, manisandro |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Branch |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Panos Asproulis
2022-05-27 17:37:01 UTC
I have been backing away from EPEL packaging due to the craziness around CentOS 8 being EOL and the uncertainty around EL 9. If you are a packager I will add you to the project if you'd like to maintain it. Thingss are so broken that I tried rebuilding the rawhide branch for EPEL 9 but the mock configs are unusable. There's just too many problems around EPEL packaging right now for me to commit by limited time. I am sorry for the problems you are having. What do you mean by "uncertainty around EL9"? I guess the only choice left is to use homebrew. |