Bug 2092037

Summary: Firefox 101 released - multiple security fixes
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brian Morrison <bdm>
Component: firefoxAssignee: Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 36CC: erack, gecko-bugs-nobody, jhorak, kai-engert-fedora, klaas, pjasicek, rhughes, rstrode, sandmann, stransky
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: firefox-101.0-1.fc36 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-04 01:16:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Brian Morrison 2022-05-31 15:12:09 UTC 
Description of problem:

Firefox release 101 contains over a dozen security and memory safety fixes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

firefox-100.0.2-2
Comment 1 Martin Stransky 2022-05-31 17:04:49 UTC 
We're blocked by nss package update here.
Comment 2 Brian Morrison 2022-05-31 17:17:11 UTC 
Interesting, nss 3.78 was released a month ago.
Comment 3 Brian Morrison 2022-06-01 13:12:10 UTC 
For Fedora 36 new nss builds have arrived:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1974098

Expect there are others for other Fedora releases.
Comment 4 Klaas Demter 2022-06-02 20:02:19 UTC 
Firefox 101 builds arrived in koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87814229
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-06-03 08:37:14 UTC 
FEDORA-2022-080ea50338 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-080ea50338
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-06-04 01:16:13 UTC 
FEDORA-2022-080ea50338 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.