Bug 2092259

Summary:	Review Request: rust-symphonia-core - Project Symphonia shared structs, traits, and features
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Carmelo Sarta <carmelo.sarta.main>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	decathorpe, package-review, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-11-13 00:45:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Carmelo Sarta 2022-06-01 08:04:29 UTC

Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Laiot/rust-symphonia-core-srpm/master/rust-symphonia-core.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/Laiot/rust-symphonia-core-srpm/raw/master/rust-symphonia-core-0.5.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
Description: Project [Symphonia](https://crates.io/crates/symphonia/) shared structs, traits, and features.
Fedora Account System Username: laiot

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2022-07-03 20:10:57 UTC

Hmm, the build fails with "File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rust-symphonia-core-0.5.0-1.fc37.x86_64/usr/share/cargo/registry/symphonia-core-0.5.0/LICENSE".
Shouldn't the license just be packaged as '%license LICENSE' until upstream fixes the issue?

Comment 2 Package Review 2022-11-13 00:45:49 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.