Bug 209294
Summary: | dillorc not read? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bob T. <rdtennent> |
Component: | dillo | Assignee: | Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-10-04 14:00:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bob T.
2006-10-04 13:01:19 UTC
Please read the changelog: * Wed Oct 04 2006 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> 0.8.6-3 - fix #199852 * Wed Jul 05 2006 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> 0.8.6-2 - fix some more aspects of #187691 (package now contains dillo and dillo-i18n) - fix #197370 Especially important is #187691: The dillo package used to be the stock dillo which was missin some important features. So I patched the original dillo with the -i18n patch and supplied only that one but as of #187691 both are included... the original as dillo and the -i18n version as dillo-i18n... you might want to use that version instead of the 'plain' dillo... If I replace dillo with dillo-i18n, the list bullets are huge ugly splotches. This seems to be font-independent. Should this be submitted as a separate bug? |