Bug 2092956
| Summary: | Please branch and build python-tinydb in EPEL 9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Enrique <cquike> |
| Component: | python-tinydb | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | petersen, suanand |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-tinydb-4.7.1-1.el9 python-tinydb-4.5.2-1.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-11-01 01:51:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Enrique
2022-06-02 15:35:05 UTC
FWIW, I have tried to create an RPM with mock from the specfile from the f37 branch as is found in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tinydb/branches?branchname=rawhide. The RPM installs without problems and I have also run the unit tests of tinydb with pytest: ============================================================================= 199 passed in 1.00s ============================================================================== I have also run the unit tests of an internal application that uses extensively tinydb and everything works fine. So I would suggest that maybe creating a epel9 branch from the f37 branch should be enough to have a working tinydb in EPEL 9. The mock configuration I have chosen was alma+epel-9-x86_64. I could do more tests if that helps to get the package in EPEL 9. Thank you! BTW, I am not targeting EPEL 8 any longer, so I will edit the title to reflect that. I have also run "pip check" to ensure that there are no broken dependencies and everything is fine. I think it should be enough to create a epel9 branch from commit d61f4c873a29f05d4db1fe8d5f48e9b86db203ec in pagure (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tinydb/c/d61f4c873a29f05d4db1fe8d5f48e9b86db203ec?branch=rawhide) and create a build from it. Could someone with commit rights do that? Thanks! Sorry this has taken so long: I am contacting the maintainer for help on this. Probably if someone wants to take over the package that would also be fine. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ea76208fbf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ea76208fbf FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ea76208fbf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ea76208fbf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Thank you very much for that! I have installed and did a brief test and everything seems to work. I will probably build for epel8 though I am wondering which version to build.. Hi, thank you for also looking at epel8. I think that at least a version >= 4 would make sense. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ea76208fbf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. (In reply to Enrique from comment #9) > thank you for also looking at epel8. I think that at least a version >= 4 > would make sense. Okay I went with 4.5.2, shrug :-) Thanks FEDORA-EPEL-2023-789b5b5e6d has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-789b5b5e6d FEDORA-EPEL-2023-789b5b5e6d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-789b5b5e6d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-789b5b5e6d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |