Bug 209320
Summary: | attempt to lock already locked VG hangs with gulm | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Nate Straz <nstraz> |
Component: | lvm2 | Assignee: | Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.4 | CC: | agk, cfeist, dwysocha, mbroz |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2007-0287 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-08 00:10:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nate Straz
2006-10-04 16:11:34 UTC
clvmd was looking for LCK_NONBLOCK as the flag for a non-blocking lock, whereas it has been translated into the (DLM-specific) LKF_NOQUEUE flag by that time. Checking in daemons/clvmd/clvmd-command.c; /cvs/lvm2/LVM2/daemons/clvmd/clvmd-command.c,v <-- clvmd-command.c new revision: 1.14; previous revision: 1.13 done Checking in daemons/clvmd/clvmd-gulm.c; /cvs/lvm2/LVM2/daemons/clvmd/clvmd-gulm.c,v <-- clvmd-gulm.c new revision: 1.20; previous revision: 1.19 done Checking in daemons/clvmd/clvmd-gulm.h; /cvs/lvm2/LVM2/daemons/clvmd/clvmd-gulm.h,v <-- clvmd-gulm.h new revision: 1.3; previous revision: 1.2 done Checking in lib/locking/locking.h; /cvs/lvm2/LVM2/lib/locking/locking.h,v <-- locking.h new revision: 1.29; previous revision: 1.28 done Set to POST rather than MODIFIED... lvm2-cluster-2.02.17-1 fix verified in lvm2-cluster-2.02.17-1. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0287.html |