Bug 209379

Summary: xinetd integration with SELinux
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers>
Component: xinetdAssignee: Steve Grubb <sgrubb>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fenlason, iboverma, paul.moore, sgrubb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-01 17:24:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 211039    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Combine local and remote contexts when using netlabel'd contexts none

Description Linda Knippers 2006-10-04 22:14:19 UTC
Description of problem:

This problem was discussed in the LSPP conference call and on the
selinux and lspp mailing lists so I'm filing the bugzilla for
tracking purposes.  The issue was raised by Stephen Smalley and
according to Stephen, xinetd will run a service with different a
TE context that the service should have.
See:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-lspp/2006-October/msg00013.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I believe this is with Rawhide and perhaps FC6 and RHEL5.

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

From the mail:

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 10:04 -0500, Loulwa Salem wrote:

>> xinetd
>> -------
>>      GW: anyone has problems with xinetd
>>      PM: there was a discussion on mailing list on the thread of sec id
>> 	reconciliation that I told steve about. Basically Stephen smalley had
>> 	some concerns about xinetd. I have not seen a reply from Steve.
>>      DW: what is this about?
>>      PM: Stephen smalley basically wanted to use, and I'm gonna make up a term
>> 	here, a hybrid context. he wasn't happy with blindly taking the ftp
>> 	context. I think we can handle that in user space so probably not a big
>> 	deal
>>      GW: so we'll keep discussing xinetd next week as well


To clarify, if xinetd simply runs the service in the peer context, then
the TE domain of the service won't be what we expect it to be, e.g.
instead of running gssftp (/usr/kerberos/sbin/ftpd) in ftpd_t, it would
end up running in the peer's domain (e.g. unconfined_t under targeted,
user_t under strict, or if we had a distinct domain for the ftp client,
whatever domain it would run in).

Looking back, I first raised this issue on redhat-lspp Sep 29 2005 (yes
2005) in response to earlier discussion of the xinetd patch, but
unfortunately lost track of it and didn't remember when the xinetd patch
finally resurfaced this year.  Sorry.

xinetd can ask the kernel what context it would normally run the service
in by default via security_compute_create(), and can adjust the MLS
component based on the peer context.

Comment 1 James Antill 2006-11-29 21:41:09 UTC
Created attachment 142437 [details]
Combine local and remote contexts when using netlabel'd contexts

 Here's the latest patch to solve this problem. The config. stuff isn't used,
if this is accepted I'll remove it and repost.
 It's also available in rpm form from: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/xinetd/

Comment 2 James Antill 2006-12-01 17:16:23 UTC
 Fix checked into CVS.