Bug 2093963

python-structlog fails to build with Python 3.11.0b3.


=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_________________ TestFormatExcInfo.test_gets_exc_info_on_bool _________________

self = <tests.test_processors.TestFormatExcInfo object at 0x7f252826cd90>

    def test_gets_exc_info_on_bool(self):
        """
        If exc_info is True, it is obtained using sys.exc_info().
        """
        # monkeypatching sys.exc_info makes currently py.test return 1 on
        # success.
        try:
            raise ValueError("test")
        except ValueError:
            d = format_exc_info(None, None, {"exc_info": True})
    
        assert "exc_info" not in d
>       assert 'raise ValueError("test")\nValueError: test' in d["exception"]
E       assert 'raise ValueError("test")\nValueError: test' in 'Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/structlog-19.2.0/tests/test_processors.py", line 330, in test_gets_exc_info_on_bool\n    raise ValueError("test")\n    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nValueError: test'

../tests/test_processors.py:335: AssertionError
___________________ TestThreadLocalDict.test_delattr_missing ___________________

self = <tests.test_threadlocal.TestThreadLocalDict object at 0x7f2528170190>
D = <class 'structlog.threadlocal.WrappedDict-330b050f-c844-4ed1-b572-3f960b0760b4'>

    def test_delattr_missing(self, D):
        """
        __delattr__ on an inexisting attribute raises AttributeError.
        """
        d = D()
    
        with pytest.raises(AttributeError) as e:
            d._tl.__delattr__("does_not_exist")
    
>       assert "does_not_exist" == e.value.args[0]
E       assert 'does_not_exist' == "'_thread._lo...es_not_exist'"
E         - '_thread._local' object has no attribute 'does_not_exist'
E         + does_not_exist

../tests/test_threadlocal.py:252: AssertionError
=============================== warnings summary ===============================
../../../../../usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1252
  /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1252: PytestConfigWarning: Unknown config option: strict
  
    self._warn_or_fail_if_strict(f"Unknown config option: {key}\n")

-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [3] ../tests/test_dev.py:94: Problem only exists on Python 2.
SKIPPED [1] ../tests/test_processors.py:194: simplejson is missing.
SKIPPED [1] ../tests/test_processors.py:209: python-rapidjson is missing.
SKIPPED [10] ../tests/test_processors.py:300: Skipped
SKIPPED [1] ../tests/test_threadlocal.py:215: Needs greenlet.
XFAIL ../tests/test_twisted.py::TestExtractStuffAndWhy::test_recognizesErrorsAndCleansThem
  Py3 does not allow for cleaning exc_info
FAILED ../tests/test_processors.py::TestFormatExcInfo::test_gets_exc_info_on_bool
FAILED ../tests/test_threadlocal.py::TestThreadLocalDict::test_delattr_missing
======= 2 failed, 350 passed, 16 skipped, 1 xfailed, 1 warning in 0.92s ========

https://docs.python.org/3.11/whatsnew/3.11.html

For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.11/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04499139-python-structlog/

For all our attempts to build python-structlog with Python 3.11, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.11/package/python-structlog/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.11:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.11/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.11 is planned to be included in Fedora 37. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.11.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.