Bug 209450

Summary:	RFE: add support for a default OCSP responder
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Component:	mod_nss	Assignee:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5	CC:	extras-qa, triage
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:	bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-04-04 14:01:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rob Crittenden 2006-10-05 13:33:47 UTC

mod_nss currently has support for OCSP if it is enabled in the module and the
certificate presented has an OCSP responder in it.

NSS has the ability to define a default responder which is used instead of one
embedded in a certificate. Support for this should be added to mod_nss.

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 03:55:00 UTC

Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're
sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted
on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to
make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks.

If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6,
please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly
encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to
refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs
for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL

If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days
from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in
the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If
you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting
the change.

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we are following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.

And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things
better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 Rob Crittenden 2008-04-04 14:01:19 UTC

This was done and the bug never updated.

Checked into tip:

Checking in mod_nss.c;
/cvs/dirsec/mod_nss/mod_nss.c,v  <--  mod_nss.c
new revision: 1.15; previous revision: 1.14
done
Checking in mod_nss.h;
/cvs/dirsec/mod_nss/mod_nss.h,v  <--  mod_nss.h
new revision: 1.17; previous revision: 1.16
done
Checking in nss_engine_config.c;
/cvs/dirsec/mod_nss/nss_engine_config.c,v  <--  nss_engine_config.c
new revision: 1.14; previous revision: 1.13
done
Checking in nss_engine_init.c;
/cvs/dirsec/mod_nss/nss_engine_init.c,v  <--  nss_engine_init.c
new revision: 1.25; previous revision: 1.24
done
Checking in nss.conf.in;
/cvs/dirsec/mod_nss/nss.conf.in,v  <--  nss.conf.in
new revision: 1.10; previous revision: 1.9
done