Bug 209468 (sjitter)

Summary: Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool...
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nicolas Hennion <nicolashennion>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideFlags: mtasaka: fedora‑review-
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-05 04:08:15 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Nicolas Hennion 2006-10-05 10:40:01 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.alcasat.net/dev/sjitter/sjitter.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.alcasat.net/dev/sjitter/sjitter-0.14b-1.src.rpm
Description: Sjitter is a command line client/server to measure jitter (based on RFC 1889), one way UDP delay and bandwidth.
Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-10-07 16:37:22 EDT
This seems to be your first package? In that case you should
block FE-NEEDSPONSOR 177841.

Your spec file isn't adhering to the Guidelines.
I think you should read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

and you can also take a look at existing fedora extras spec files
to have an idea of the usual spec files. For example from
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/?root=extras
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-12-27 13:07:08 EST
switching to NEEDINFO from reporter.
Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-25 11:28:19 EST
ping again?
Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-03-19 13:58:14 EDT
I will close this bug as WONTFIX if there is no response
from the reporter within a week.
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-04-05 04:08:15 EDT
Closing as WONTFIX