Bug 209468 (sjitter)

Summary:	Review Request: Sjitter - Another network performance tool...
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nicolas Hennion <nicolashennion>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	Flags:	mtasaka: fedora-review-
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-04-05 08:08:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Nicolas Hennion 2006-10-05 14:40:01 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.alcasat.net/dev/sjitter/sjitter.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.alcasat.net/dev/sjitter/sjitter-0.14b-1.src.rpm
Description: Sjitter is a command line client/server to measure jitter (based on RFC 1889), one way UDP delay and bandwidth.

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-10-07 20:37:22 UTC

This seems to be your first package? In that case you should
block FE-NEEDSPONSOR 177841.

Your spec file isn't adhering to the Guidelines.
I think you should read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

and you can also take a look at existing fedora extras spec files
to have an idea of the usual spec files. For example from
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/?root=extras

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2006-12-27 18:07:08 UTC

switching to NEEDINFO from reporter.

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-25 16:28:19 UTC

ping again?

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-03-19 17:58:14 UTC

I will close this bug as WONTFIX if there is no response
from the reporter within a week.

Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-04-05 08:08:15 UTC

Closing as WONTFIX