Bug 2094975
| Summary: | centos-release-samba416-1.0-1.1.el8.noarch - dump_core | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | lejeczek <peljasz> |
| Component: | samba | Assignee: | Anoop C S <anoopcs> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | sssd-qe |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | CentOS Stream | CC: | abokovoy, aboscatt, anoopcs, bstinson, dkarpele, gdeschner, jarrpa, jwboyer, pfilipen |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-07-04 16:57:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
lejeczek
2022-06-08 18:21:38 UTC
Apologies, this is on CentOS 8 Stream - I missed the bit and bugzilla chose for me. With Samba packages installed from centos-release-samba416, * Can you attach debug level 10 logs while starting smbd? * Output of `rpm -qf /usr/lib64/samba/pdb/ipasam.so`? * Output of `rpm -qa | grep samba`? FYI, RHEL IdM team does not test against centos-release-samba416 at all, so ipasam PDB module is not guaranteed to work at all against an alternative Samba build. If it worked before, fine, but no effort would be done to test it against alternative builds. (In reply to Anoop C S from comment #2) > With Samba packages installed from centos-release-samba416, > > * Can you attach debug level 10 logs while starting smbd? > * Output of `rpm -qf /usr/lib64/samba/pdb/ipasam.so`? > * Output of `rpm -qa | grep samba`? I cannot I'm sorry - these were production systems and I had to bring then back to "normal" - which I did by swapping to "default" Samba. But it should be easy to reproduce and then go full on debug, just use centos-release-samba416 "under" IPA. @everyone-involved(Redhat) if I may share an opinion (@IPA guys - I could not ask for more, you do more that I'd expect from my perspective) - on GlusterFS. Redhat own, support & promote GlusterFS but in places a picture emerges where GlusterFS is the black sheep to Redhat. No GlusterFS in default packages, like Samba, unless "fixed in" by SIGs and recently GlusterFS Redhat removed from Qemu/Libvirt. Everywhere you look libgfapi beats fuse by a mile. End users, consumers, everybody gets that there is a cost to it, as there always is to developing & maintain anything not only software, but is that really so bad so Redhat paints that sheep black (when convenient). I recommend GlusterFS is taken seriously by RH(including CentOS) and is fully "fixed" in what is default out-of-box vanilla. thanks, L. While we look into this in parallel, bug #2100088(and hopefully similar one for libldb) has been opened to investigate the possibilities of adding requirements for rebuilding Samba on CentOS with system libraries. Also the current issue being specific to Samba from Storage SIG makes it more sense to be tracked via CentOS bug trackers. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days |