Bug 209513

Summary:	gjdoc requires antlr on classpath
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Anthony Green <green>
Component:	gjdoc	Assignee:	Andrew Overholt <overholt>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mjw, tromey
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-10-06 18:48:28 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Anthony Green 2006-10-05 18:30:39 UTC

Description of problem:
When I build the kawa SRPM, I need to add antlr to the classpath in order 
for gjdoc to run.  Isn't there some other way to force antlr in there so users
don't have to add it manually?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install the kawa SRPM from devel
2.remove antlr from the classpath
3.build it
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2006-10-05 21:59:03 UTC

antlr.jar *is* on the gjdoc classpath.  It's not a Requirement of it, though. 
I've fixed this and pushed a build.  Hopefully we can get this into FC6 or at
least soon afterwards as an update.

Comment 2 Anthony Green 2006-10-06 00:01:01 UTC

antlr.jar is not on the classpath in my test case.  See...

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-October/msg00003.html

Note that in my case the code is being invoked directly by ant, isn't it?

Comment 3 Tom Tromey 2006-10-06 00:08:44 UTC

I'm under the impression that ant execs javadoc, and does not
try to invoke it directly.  I haven't looked at the code to
verify this, however.  Still, there's nothing in that stack trace
that indicates ant.

Comment 4 Stepan Kasal 2006-10-06 09:43:07 UTC

Bug 209595 might be related to this.

Comment 5 Andrew Overholt 2006-10-06 18:48:28 UTC

I *think* this is a dupe.  If not, please re-open, Anthony.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209595 ***