Bug 2095132

Summary: Package request for EPE9 - gnome-calendar
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Panos Asproulis <panos.asproulis>
Component: gnome-calendarAssignee: Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: gnome-sig, klember, yselkowi
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gnome-calendar-40.2-1.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-18 00:43:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2142389    

Description Panos Asproulis 2022-06-09 06:02:39 UTC
Please, branch and build package gnome-calendar for EPEL9.

Comment 1 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-06 03:12:11 UTC
Since F36 (GNOME 42) gnome-calendar requires gtk4 4.6 but RHEL9 has only 4.4, so at most this would have to be from F35 (GNOME 41), or from F34 (GNOME 40) to match the rest of RHEL9.  Either way, two dependencies -- libdazzle-devel and libhandy-devel -- are missing from RHEL.  These can be substituted with EPEL-only packages as outlined in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/

I am also interested in gnome-calendar for EPEL9 as a dependency of other packages.  If you are willing to maintain this in EPEL, then I can help with the EPEL-only packages if you need.  If you are not interested, then I am willing to do so for EPEL.

Comment 2 Kalev Lember 2022-12-07 17:07:29 UTC
It would be awesome if you could help, Yaakov. Thanks! Are you part of epel-packagers-sig?

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-07 17:13:34 UTC
Yes, I am.  I filed the following to create the EPEL-only packages for the missing dependencies:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49728
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49729

Comment 4 Kalev Lember 2022-12-07 17:50:58 UTC
OK, I added @epel-packagers-sig to the package. Thanks for the help with this!

Comment 5 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-09 06:30:15 UTC
Dependencies are built, requested branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49778

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-09 18:07:15 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-10 02:32:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-12-18 00:43:14 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.