Bug 2096909
| Summary: | Systemd and service resources do not comply with the OCF1.1 standard | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Markéta Smazová <msmazova> |
| Component: | pacemaker | Assignee: | Ken Gaillot <kgaillot> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | cluster-qe <cluster-qe> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9.0 | CC: | cluster-maint, tojeline |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
| Doc Text: |
This is mostly invisible to end users
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Enhancement | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Markéta Smazová
2022-06-14 14:23:52 UTC
Right, only OCF agents can validate against the OCF schema. Pacemaker simulates OCF-like meta-data for non-OCF resources, but it can't be perfect since they don't actually support the OCF standard. At best we could supply an alternate schema for non-OCF meta-data. (In reply to Ken Gaillot from comment #1) > Right, only OCF agents can validate against the OCF schema. Interesting. I always thought, that pacemaker generates OCF valid meta-data for all non-OCF agents, so that the agents can be worked with as if they were truly OCF. What you said would suggest that this is not the case, and non-OCF agents and their meta-data potentially need to be handled differently. (In reply to Tomas Jelinek from comment #2) > (In reply to Ken Gaillot from comment #1) > > Right, only OCF agents can validate against the OCF schema. > > Interesting. I always thought, that pacemaker generates OCF valid meta-data > for all non-OCF agents, so that the agents can be worked with as if they > were truly OCF. What you said would suggest that this is not the case, and > non-OCF agents and their meta-data potentially need to be handled > differently. Correct -- non-OCF agents don't support parameters for example, but the OCF standard requires at least one parameter to be specified. Technically they may not support all the required actions either, but Pacemaker probably already simulates those. If we relax the requirement for parameters in the next OCF standard, I suppose we could make them compliant, which would be convenient. |