Bug 21

Summary: IP Masquerading broken
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: jhohertz
Component: distributionAssignee: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: alpha   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 1998-11-19 16:25:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description jhohertz 1998-11-10 13:02:27 UTC
Trying to follow the HOWTO to add a subnet for IP Masqurade
results in and error stating setsockopt recieved an invalid
parameter. I have recompiled the kernel, as well as the
source RPM of ipfwadm with no lock.

I first noticed this when I updated my system to RawHide
1.0.6 and it persists even after an upgrade to 5.2.

I flag this as major, as this is a very common feature used
by those with a SOHO on their hands.

Thanks. Please contact me if you want more info.

Comment 1 Preston Brown 1998-11-13 17:01:59 UTC
Please provide the exact text of the commands that you are trying
to do, and the failure messages.

Comment 2 ddionne 1998-11-19 16:01:59 UTC
I have the exact same problem on my 5.1 system.  I have also noted
that my modules do not load correctly.  I think this is because of
the rc.sysinit file that has a reference to /sbin/lilo (this is on an
alpha) in order to get the kernel version to create the link to

Comment 3 ddionne 1998-11-19 16:06:59 UTC
This is what I am using Redhat 5.1 Kern. 2.0.34, and this is what I

ipfwadm -F -p deny <cr> works fine
ipfwadm -F -a m -S -D <cr> returns
ipfwadm: setsocketopt failed: Invalid argument

Comment 4 David Lawrence 1998-11-19 16:25:59 UTC
5.2 no longer uses cmdline stuff from LILO to create the preferred
link in /lib/modules. Therefor there is no longer reference in
rc.sysinit for /sbin/lilo. It sounds like you may have forgot to run
make modules and make modules_install after compiling the kernel with
IP firewalling as a module. If you do this and everything goes
properly, the depmod -a in rc.sysint should find the modules.

Comment 5 jhohertz 1998-11-20 13:48:59 UTC
I don't think this is fixed yet, as the resolution is NOT for the
problem as initially described. IP Masqurading is not a module (but
there are helper modules.)

The ipfwadm problem is still outstanding, and I have recently found
two emails related to it with workarounds in my Inbox. The first is a
quick fix, and the second gets to the heart of the matter.

---[First: Quick fix]----------
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 11:43:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael <michael@area54.net>
To: jhohertz@golden.net
Subject: Re: Anyone else have problems with ip_masq and Alpha Linux
kernel 2.0.35??

The problem is the ipfwadm rpm that ships with 5.1 & 5.2 .

Uninstall it and grab the one in the 5.0 dist. and it will work fine
(assuming the kernel is built for it).

---[Second: Heart of the matter]-----
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 10:29:03 -0500
From: Bob Fahey <bob@invengen.com>
To: axp-list@redhat.com
Subject: RE: Anyone else have problems with ip_masq and Alpha Linux
kernel 2.0.35??

GREAT question.  I spent about the last 3 days on my Alpha trying to
figure out the exact same problem.

The problem is that, from what I can tell, one of the includes with
glibc 2.0.7 is incorrect, since it assumes you're running on a 32-bit
machine.  This problem still exists even in 2.0.7-29, and needs to be
fixed in the next release, IMHO.  Comments?

I changed /usr/include/netinet/ip_fw.h, and recompiled ipfwadm.  Now
it works just fine.  The change is in the struct ip_fw -- there are
2 arguments, fw_pcnt and fw_bcnt that are defined as u_int32_t.  If
you change these to long, and recompile ipfwadm, it should work fine.

On the same note, when you set up masquerading, don't forget to change
/etc/sysconfig/network, setting FORWARD_IPV4 to true.  I didn't find
a reference to this in the IP-Masquerading HOWTO, but maybe it is
in some other documentation somewhere....

-bob fahey