Bug 2100648

Summary: Please build gavl for EPEL 9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: gavlAssignee: Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: kwizart
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gavl-1.4.0-20.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-07-06 02:12:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2100649    
Bug Blocks: 2100651    

Description Robert Scheck 2022-06-23 21:56:34 UTC
Please branch and build gavl in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain gavl in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gavl/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2022-06-24 08:07:04 UTC
branched requested...

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2022-06-27 09:54:30 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a31ec2769e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a31ec2769e

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2022-06-28 01:53:30 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a31ec2769e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a31ec2769e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-07-06 02:12:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a31ec2769e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.