Bug 2101040

Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45337

In the meanwhile (pun intended) I've updated meanwhile to the latest release on github and cleaned up the SPEC file: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meanwhile/c/91088ce1969bd92981362196168d5f3e85bd65d6?branch=rawhide
If you can, it would be nice to know if this update works: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=meanwhile

I've not been using meanwhile for many years (it's Lotus still a thing?), would be nice to have additional maintainers for the package. If you want I can add you as a maintainer.

Hi Simone, 

Since I've never written code against this lib/package directly, I wouldn't know how to test it, beyond running `make test` or `make check` from within the build directory. I haven't looked at the spec file, but I assume that's already happening, and passing when it's built on Koji? 

Personally, I'm just trying to get Pidgin working. There were a few missing dependencies, so once all of them are available, I can presumably test Pidgin, and report back with a new bug report if there's a problem?

L~

P.S. This could be a silly question, but I don't see the EL9 branch at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meanwhile ... is there a lag?

(In reply to Ladar Levison from comment #2)
> Since I've never written code against this lib/package directly, I wouldn't
> know how to test it, beyond running `make test` or `make check` from within
> the build directory. I haven't looked at the spec file, but I assume that's
> already happening, and passing when it's built on Koji? 

No I meant if you could actually test the Lotus/Sametime integration, but it seems not.
> 
> Personally, I'm just trying to get Pidgin working. There were a few missing
> dependencies, so once all of them are available, I can presumably test
> Pidgin, and report back with a new bug report if there's a problem?

Yes sure, this of course is fine.

> P.S. This could be a silly question, but I don't see the EL9 branch at
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meanwhile ... is there a lag?

Look here, once this is approved, the branch is created and I will try to build it (tonight or tomorrow morning at maximum):

(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1)
> Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45337

(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #3)
> Look here, once this is approved, the branch is created and I will try to
> build it (tonight or tomorrow morning at maximum):
> 
> (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1)
> > Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45337

Ah. I saw that, but I didn't realize the branch needed approval. I thought the package maintainer could do it unilaterally. 

I'm still learning.

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb34d33dd8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb34d33dd8

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb34d33dd8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb34d33dd8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cb34d33dd8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.