Bug 2103473
| Summary: | Review Request: meshcommander - Intel AMT management console | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Davide Cavalca <davide> | ||||
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | package-review:
needinfo?
(davide) |
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | https://www.meshcommander.com/meshcommander | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Davide Cavalca
2022-07-03 16:47:43 UTC
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89034101 This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander-0.9.5~a-1.fc39.src.rpm Changelog: - rebuild for Rawhide Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6155105 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2103473-meshcommander/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06155105-meshcommander/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander-0.9.5~a-1.fc41.src.rpm Changelog: - convert license tag to SPDX Created attachment 2036085 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6155105 to 7522375
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7522375 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2103473-meshcommander/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07522375-meshcommander/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - License file LICENSE-MIT is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. |