Bug 2105155
Summary: | Please branch and build python-sphinx-argparse for EPEL9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Jos de Kloe <josdekloe> |
Component: | python-sphinx-argparse | Assignee: | Avram Lubkin <aviso> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel9 | CC: | aviso, bcl, lbalhar, lupinix.fedora, mikel |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-sphinx-argparse-0.3.1-1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-08-24 20:40:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2036838, 2099676 |
Description
Jos de Kloe
2022-07-08 06:55:49 UTC
See discussion in bug 1772481 I tested with version 0.3.1 from the PR[1] I created for rawhide some months ago and it works fine. If PR is approved I could take care of EPEL9 (and maybe EPEL8), even for Fedora if required. My FAS is mikelo2 [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-argparse/pull-request/2 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d0ce9dbe1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d0ce9dbe1 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d0ce9dbe1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d0ce9dbe1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. The problem I see here is that the package is not installable without CRB repo (which is disabled by default). See my comment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036838#c8 Is this expected? Ah, it is, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036838#c9 I'm sorry for the noise. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4d0ce9dbe1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |