Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 2107281

Summary: RFE: Ability to move vm between two clusters while keeping the same IP using provider network
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Jeremy <jmelvin>
Component: openstack-neutronAssignee: OSP Team <rhos-maint>
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED QA Contact: Eran Kuris <ekuris>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16.1 (Train)CC: chrisw, dalvarez, gurpsing, jlibosva, mlavalle, mtomaska, scohen
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-10-20 18:11:58 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeremy 2022-07-14 16:31:22 UTC
Description of problem:

Customer needs to move lots of vms during maintenance periods from one cluster to another.  However since the customer is using provider vlan networks they can not keep the same ip. Different clusters have different allocation pools, there is concern of duplicate ips, dhcp leases etc, wrong dhcp server responding etc.

We might be able to use something like external dhcp between clusters, share same vlan ip range?   however they are still worried about potential problems. It's worth pointing out the customer is currently using OVS , however they would move to OVN in the future.  So we would need a solution that works in ovs and can withstand an ovn migration.  We are looking for a well documented solution , I'm aware of os-migrate,however that seems to use tenant networks, so wouldn't work here. The customer is able to do this in vmware and see's this as a lack of usability for Openstack.

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-02-18 04:25:07 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days