Bug 2111041
| Summary: | Potential invalid scan results in OpenSCAP [rhel-7.9.z] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Matus Marhefka <mmarhefk> |
| Component: | openscap | Assignee: | Jan Černý <jcerny> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Matus Marhefka <mmarhefk> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Jan Fiala <jafiala> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.9 | CC: | amepatil, ekolesni, jafiala, jcerny, kpfleming, mhaicman, mmarhefk, qe-baseos-security |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openscap-1.2.17-15.el7_9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.OpenSCAP no longer produces incorrect errors when checking available memory
Previously, when evaluating some XCCDF rules, OpenSCAP incorrectly showed the error message `Failed to check available memory` and produced invalid scan results. For example, this occurred for rules `accounts_user_dot_no_world_writable_programs`, `accounts_user_dot_group_ownership`, and `accounts_users_home_files_permissions`. With this update, the bug in error handling is fixed and the error message appears only for real failures.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 2109485 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2023-03-07 09:54:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2109485 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2111040 | ||
|
Description
Matus Marhefka
2022-07-26 11:37:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (openscap bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1094 |