Bug 2115826
| Summary: | User Workload monitoring thanos-querier rewrites "cluster" field with name of openshift-cluster instead of Application's cluster-field name | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | nigsmith |
| Component: | Monitoring | Assignee: | Jayapriya Pai <janantha> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 4.9 | CC: | anpicker, jmarcal, ssonigra |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-03-09 01:27:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
nigsmith
2022-08-05 13:42:41 UTC
Can you provide a Mustgather otherwise it might be difficult for uns to exactly understand what might be happening Actually, Thanos querier is working as expected because it will always include the external labels from Prometheus. Not sure how much of an annoyance it is for the customer but maybe we can improve our documentation to illustrate better the differences between Thanos and Prometheus APIs. apologies case is now linked, the must-gather is attached to the case Hello Joao,
>Actually, Thanos querier is working as expected because it will always include the external labels from Prometheus. Not sure how much of an annoyance it is for the customer but maybe we can improve our > >documentation to illustrate better the differences between Thanos and Prometheus APIs.
Initially I thought this was the case - documentation bug rather than a code bug.
do we have it documented anywhere that this is the expected behaviour?
Thanks
OpenShift has moved to Jira for its defect tracking! This bug can now be found in the OCPBUGS project in Jira. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-9450 |