Bug 2116296

Summary:	[RFE] Support `ports` word for bond, linux bridge and ovs bridge
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Gris Ge <fge>
Component:	nmstate	Assignee:	Gris Ge <fge>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Mingyu Shi <mshi>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.1	CC:	ferferna, jiji, jishi, network-qe, till
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-11-15 10:01:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gris Ge 2022-08-08 07:50:08 UTC

Description of problem:

We got customer report indicating the use of `ports` in bridge/bond which lead to invalid argument error.

Nmstate should support both `ports` and `port` for bond and bridge.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Gris Ge 2022-08-08 08:13:24 UTC

Patch posted to https://github.com/nmstate/nmstate/pull/2004

Comment 6 Mingyu Shi 2022-08-29 03:28:29 UTC

Verified with:
nmstate-2.2.0-0.20220824093819832661.pr2015.11.g225cf980.el9.x86_64
NetworkManager-1.39.90-1.el9.x86_64
openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-68.el9fdp.x86_64

Both "port" and "ports" work when applying, but only show "port" when show the state.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-15 10:01:25 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (nmstate bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:7991