Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 product line. The current stable release is 4.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 211829

Summary:	CVE-2006-4811 qt integer overflow
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component:	qt	Assignee:	Than Ngo <than>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0	CC:	rdieter, security-response-team
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	impact=moderate,source=vendorsec,reported=20061013,public=20061013
Fixed In Version:	RHSA-2006-0725	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-11-01 14:51:38 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Josh Bressers 2006-10-23 13:14:21 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #210742 +++

An interger overflow flaw was found in the way qt handles certain pixmax
requests.  This flaw can lead to arbitrary data being written onto the heap,
possibly resulting in arbitrary code execution withing applications using qt
(such as knoqueror and kmail)

-- Additional comment from bressers on 2006-10-14 00:46 EST --
This issue also affects RHEL2.1 and RHEL3

Comment 1 Than Ngo 2006-10-23 19:52:59 UTC

it's fixed in RHSA-2006:0725.

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-11-01 14:51:38 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0725.html