Bug 2120194
| Summary: | Please branch and build vlgothic-fonts in epel9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ritu Agarwal <rituagar> |
| Component: | vl-gothic-fonts | Assignee: | Akira TAGOH <tagoh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, kevin, mastahnke, petersen, smooge, tagoh, tdawson |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | petersen:
mirror+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | ppc64le | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | vl-gothic-fonts-20220612-2.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-10-22 14:54:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ritu Agarwal
2022-08-22 06:20:05 UTC
Moving to fedora maintainers for comment/action. Ritu, can you explain what is the particular requirement/reason to use this older vlgothic for RHEL9? (rather than the default Noto Sans CJK font in RHEL9) Alright. I created epel9 repo for vl-gothic-fonts. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |