Bug 2122401

Summary:	Move JMC packages to CRB
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Joshua Matsuoka <jmatsuok>
Component:	jmc	Assignee:	Joshua Matsuoka <jmatsuok>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	OpenJDK QA <java-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:	Jacob Taylor Valdez <jvaldez>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.0	CC:	almacdon, cmah, fweimer, jandrlik, jvaldez, jvanek, jwboyer, kwalker, lkuprova, mthacker, pholica, pjindal, sfroberg, zveleba
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	jkang: needinfo+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	.New package: `jmc` in the CRB repository RHEL 9.2 introduces the JDK Mission Control (JMC) profiler for HotSpot JVMs version 8.2.0, available as the `jmc` package in the CodeReady Linux Builder (CRB) repository for the AMD and Intel 64-bit architectures. To install JMC, you must first enable the link:https://access.redhat.com/articles/4348511[CodeReady Linux Builder (CRB) repository]. Note that packages included in the CRB repository are unsupported.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-05-09 08:26:50 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Joshua Matsuoka 2022-08-29 23:06:40 UTC

Description of problem:

Following discussions surrounding the future of packaging for JMC it was decided that the best course of action moving forward would be to move JMC into the CRB repository. We would like to move 

jmc
jmc-core
owasp-java-encoder (dependency of jmc-core)

into the CRB repository


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 14 Paramvir jindal 2022-10-04 04:39:58 UTC

Hi Josh,

You are right that it would have some supply chain implications that wouldn't be acceptable for normal RHEL content. I was told that FedRAMP could also be an issue but if it's not then it's good but CRB would be a better place for JMC as mentioned by Joshua. Thanks!

Comment 36 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 08:26:50 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (jmc bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2591