Bug 2123284
Summary: | file_permissions_sshd_private_key is not aligned with DISA STIG benchmark [rhel-7.9.z] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Matus Marhefka <mmarhefk> |
Component: | scap-security-guide | Assignee: | Vojtech Polasek <vpolasek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Matus Marhefka <mmarhefk> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Jan Fiala <jafiala> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.9 | CC: | ggasparb, jafiala, kpfleming, matyc, mhaicman, mlysonek, qe-baseos-security, vpolasek, wsato |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | scap-security-guide-0.1.66-1.el7_9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.SCAP Security Guide rule `file_permissions_sshd_private_key` is aligned with STIG configuration RHEL-07-040420
Previously, the implementation of rule `file_permissions_sshd_private_key` allowed private SSH keys to be readable by the `ssh_keys` group with mode `0644`, while DISA STIG version RHEL-07-040420 required private SSH keys to have mode `0600`. As a consequence, evaluation with DISA’s automated STIG benchmark failed for configuration RHEL-07-040420.
For this update, we worked with DISA to align the expected permissions for private SSH keys, and now private keys are expected to have mode `0644` or less permissive. As a result, the rule `file_permissions_sshd_private_key` and configuration RHEL-07-040420 are now aligned.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 2115343 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2023-03-07 09:54:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2115343 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 3
Watson Yuuma Sato
2023-01-26 11:27:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (scap-security-guide bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1099 |