Bug 2123626
| Summary: | when running with multus enabled PVs do not mount | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna> |
| Component: | rook | Assignee: | Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.11 | CC: | agantony, etamir, jrivera, kramdoss, madam, mmuench, mrajanna, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, shouston |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | ODF 4.11.2 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, when OpenShift Data Foundation was deployed with Multus networking, the CephFS and RBD Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs) were not getting mounted. This was because the CephFS and RBD holder pod daemonset were not getting deployed due to the missing ServiceAccount name daemonset. This update adds the missing ServiceAccount name for CephFS and RBD holder pod daemonset.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 2123386 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2022-10-11 15:06:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2123386 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 3
Mudit Agarwal
2022-09-12 11:20:44 UTC
Had a chat with Eran, the QE efforts here are regression only. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.2 Bug Fix Update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:6888 |