Bug 2124775
| Summary: | [RHEL9 udisks2] Error waiting for logical volume object for xx | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | guazhang <guazhang> | ||||
| Component: | udisks2 | Assignee: | Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | guazhang <guazhang> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 9.1 | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2023-08-04 12:42:11 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2091421 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
guazhang@redhat.com
2022-09-07 06:09:00 UTC
Created attachment 1910015 [details]
test_job_log.tar
The loop issue is fixed in bug 2113809. As far as the LVM failure is concerned, is this reproducible all the time? The UDisks lvm2 module is known for random test failures, similar e.g. to bug 2039772 and bug 2031673. Yes, the failure cause by lvm module, but looks the failure info is different with bz2031673. so I'm not sure if same one. for the timeout error I have opened bz2039772 for RHEL8, and this bug for RHEL9. you can close it if you think it's duplication. the error is not always reproduced, it's random failure. Thanks, this is on par what we're seeing in upstream CI. We'll still want to have this fixed, but the fix might not be easy. Since it's a random failure, let's treat these with low priority for the moment. There's a chance this issue may have got fixed in the latest build - see bug 2031673. Could you please retest with the latest package? check with my job, don't hit the bug with the udisks2-2.9.4-8.el9. Okay, thanks for the confirmation. Closing for the time being then. |