Bug 2129005
Summary: | glibc: Do not fail name resolution if CNAMEs involve aliases which are not host names [rhel-9.2.0] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Arjun Shankar <ashankar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sergey Kolosov <skolosov> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Petr Hybl <phybl> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 9.2 | CC: | ashankar, codonell, dj, fweimer, markobri, mnewsome, pfrankli, phybl, sipoyare, skolosov |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Bugfix, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glibc-2.34-48.el9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.DNS lookup can now succeed even when some CNAME records are invalid
Previously, the `glibc` DNS stub resolver treated CNAME records with owner names that are not host names as DNS packet errors. Consequently, the DNS query failed because of the DNS packet errors. With this update, the `glibc` stub resolver now skips invalid CNAME records and the corresponding alias information is not extracted. Therefore, DNS lookups can now succeed even if the server response includes a CNAME chain that contains a domain name that is not a host name.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-05-09 08:16:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Florian Weimer
2022-09-22 09:26:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (glibc bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2481 |